A Fundamental
View
An exclusive technical analysis view of markets, and in particular cur-
rency pairs, is highly flawed. The weaknesses and limits of technical anal-
ysis starts with a misunderstanding of what currency prices are all about.
The currency pair is, from a technical analysis view of market reality, a
point on the X–Y price axis. Charts visualize the price behavior.
For
example, if the EURUSD has moved 20 pips, from 1.1700 to 1.1720, a
line chart will show how this movement has occurred. Candlestick charts
show open, high, low, and close prices per unit of time (minute, hour, or
other time slices). The X axis represents time. Simple enough. But is that
what a price really is? The fact is that it is more than a measure on a X–Y
axis.
The fundamental viewpoint asserts that a currency price and its accompanying charts, are codes that are really enciphered signatures of expectations. A better understanding of how to unlock the codes within each currency pair will enable traders to profitably ride the expectation waves that move currency prices.
Flaws in Technical Analysis
The question arises: If technical analysis has these flaws, why is it so dominant? The answer is rather simple. The dominance of technical analysis as a tool for traders is not because technical analysis is totally effective, but because it is easy to sell systems and courses offering hyperbolic performance promises. It is natural that traders want to find the holy grail for predicting direction. As a result, responding to the desires and hopes of traders, there is extensive marketing of signals and systems, and courses that teach set-ups to respond to this demand.
Some systems and signals are profitable. None are profitable all of the time. The products of the trading industry are designed to be produced with minimal viability, because speed to the market is a more important priority than performance effectiveness. As a result, a total reliance on technical set-ups presents many flaws. Let us explore further some of the deep flaws in using technical analysis.The first deep flaw in exclusive reliance on technical analysis is psychological and philosophical. The very premise that one can predict that a price will reach a target is fraught with problems. The price target is in reality not technical in nature. It is a fabricated human construction. It is as subjective as searching for and finding a face in the clouds.
If you look for one you will find it, but it is delusional to believe that the face in the clouds really exists. Similarly, a profit target is a point of hope in the price arena. But in trading, “hopium” is not a useful drug.The very act of thinking that there is a target inherent in the currency pair price or pattern is also teleological (defined as inferring something
has an intention).
Inferring intention is a common attribute of human
behavior because it is more comforting to deal with an assumed intention then to deal with uncertainty. Consider the following statements: “The price wants to go to the next Fibonacci level”. “The price will bounce off resistance and then move to support”. “The price will break the outer trend line and then move to the inner trend line.” These types of comments are heard every day by traders and reflect the flaw that is inherent in teleological thinking in trading.
The fact is that a price does not know where it wants to go, because the price is really an instant in time of a balance between bullish and bearish expectations. A target also has the effect of suppressing profitability. Many traders who put on a trade that reaches a target price often take profit at that target, only to learn that the profits would have been higher.
Technical profit targets are best used as guides only.
A second powerful source of error and weakness in trading analysis is the use and analysis of trend lines. An uptrend is technically defined as when a price has a higher high and a higher low. A downtrend, conversely is defined as when a price has a lower high and a lower low. A popular saying is: “the trend is your friend.” Going with the trend seems like a good approach. But keep in mind that the trend is your friend until it is at an end. Trend analysis offers a great deal of ambiguity in detecting a shift in the trend.
When is it really over? Is it at a break of a line? How
thick is the line? Is it 10 pips? This difficulty of defining a break in the trend applies to both intraday and longer durations.Central banks have a very hard time pinpointing just when a break in inflation trends is occurring.
That is why they notoriously act too late and allow inflation to go too far, or too early, and put breaks on growth, stimulating a recession. Precision of projecting where prices are going is a common challenge to both traders and policy markets.
Of course, lines do not exist and are just heuristic devices, which is a method to get a sense of the boundaries of price action. Lines are mathematical inventions to overlay on what we see. At best, a trend is a map of a path of prices. It leaves a great deal of room for error. It is a very low resolution map.